Which statement is not true?

The statement that assessing information for reasonableness is a good way to determine reliability is a misunderstanding of how to evaluate information. Reliability refers to the consistency and credibility of the information and its source. While reasonableness can provide insight into the information's quality, it is not a definitive measure of reliability. Reliable information is typically backed by credible sources, factual evidence, and clear methodologies.

In contrast, the other statements capture accurate assessments of how to evaluate information. Information can indeed be reliable regardless of its relevance, as something can be factually correct but not applicable to a specific situation. Additionally, the reliability of information depends on the credibility of the source, as a trustworthy source is more likely to provide reliable information. Lastly, information may also be relevant to a context or question without being reliable; for example, anecdotal evidence may be pertinent to a discussion but could lack reliability if not supported by data. Thus, the nature of assessing reliability is more nuanced than simply considering reasonableness.